tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5383512304639632735.post3907277343296357403..comments2024-01-23T07:34:52.253-08:00Comments on Copyrights & Campaigns: California Court of Appeal reverses Kaleidescape decision; another blow to DVD copyingBen Sheffnerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06477793715765992689noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5383512304639632735.post-60353565064684861042009-08-12T14:37:05.368-07:002009-08-12T14:37:05.368-07:00@Randy:
As I said in my post, "It's impo...@Randy:<br /><br />As I said in my post, "It's important to remember that this case involved only a purely state-law contract issue; there were no DMCA or traditional copyright claims in the Kaleidescape case." This case simply did not present the question whether Kaleidescape users engage in fair use.Ben Sheffnerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06477793715765992689noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5383512304639632735.post-13614874910190813282009-08-12T14:25:22.792-07:002009-08-12T14:25:22.792-07:00To me the Kaleidescape product is no different tha...To me the Kaleidescape product is no different than the VCR/DVD and DVD/DVD recorders that can be bought today, which enable format shifting.<br /><br />I'm wondering what the courts would rule if the Betamax case were tried today.Randyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02041892308592857971noreply@blogger.com