Indeed, since the en banc decision was handed down, it seems that every conference and informal gathering in the field eventually morphs into trying to figure out what the majorityHere's thewas smokingopinion means, how judges should comply with it, how law enforcement should respond to it, and whether and how long it will be until it is overturned.
Thursday, November 5, 2009
Why legal blogs are better than law reviews
Because you can write sentences like this:
possibly drug-induced controversial opinion by the Ninth Circuit in United States v. Comprehensive Drug Testing.
3 comments:
Comments here are moderated. I appreciate substantive comments, whether or not they agree with what I've written. Stay on topic, and be civil. Comments that contain name-calling, personal attacks, or the like will be rejected. If you want to rant about how evil the RIAA and MPAA are, and how entertainment companies' employees and attorneys are bad people, there are plenty of other places for you to go.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
That and the fact that blogs can respond so much faster than law reviews and even break legal news.
ReplyDeleteBlogs may be better, but I still wish you would do more bluebooking.
ReplyDeleteIt is very cool that two of the 11 Circut Judges on this case are O'Melveny alumna.
ReplyDelete