The motion is largely a re-worked version of Tenenbaum's purported counterclaim on the same issue, which the court said was "more appropriately pled in a Motion to Dismiss." Plaintiffs have already put forward their arguments and authority in opposition (see esp. pages 17-20) -- nearly of which Tenenbaum's brief simply ignores. Ray Beckerman is not impressed.
Monday, March 9, 2009
Tenenbaum moves to dismiss claim for statutory damages
Accused peer-to-peer infringer Joel Tenenbaum has filed a motion to dismiss the record labels claim for statutory damages against him, on the grounds that such damages "represent an unconstitutional abrogation of due process when enforced against a noncommercial defendant" and "bear no reasonable relation to actual harms resulting from Joel Tenenbaum’s individual alleged infringement."
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Comments here are moderated. I appreciate substantive comments, whether or not they agree with what I've written. Stay on topic, and be civil. Comments that contain name-calling, personal attacks, or the like will be rejected. If you want to rant about how evil the RIAA and MPAA are, and how entertainment companies' employees and attorneys are bad people, there are plenty of other places for you to go.