But my favorite part of the Times' report is its headine:
Hollywood papers struggle; L.A. paper loses local news section"L.A. paper"? Who could that be?
UPDATE: the Times explains and elucidates.
Friday, January 30, 2009
LA Times skips right to Web 4.0
The LA Times is dropping its stand-alone local news section from its print edition. You think the Times would mention this in its own paper, possibly even explain and elucidate? Presumably Times reporters could walk down the hall or ride an elevator and interview the responsible parties themselves. Are you crazy? It's old-fashioned thinking like that that's sinking the newspaper business! Instead, the Times' "LA Now" blog simply cites a report about the death of its own "California" section in the LA Observed blog. (This is the same blog that the Times has tried to ban its employees from talking to, and even tried to block some employees from reading.)
But my favorite part of the Times' report is its headine:
UPDATE: the Times explains and elucidates.
But my favorite part of the Times' report is its headine:
UPDATE: the Times explains and elucidates.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment
Comments here are moderated. I appreciate substantive comments, whether or not they agree with what I've written. Stay on topic, and be civil. Comments that contain name-calling, personal attacks, or the like will be rejected. If you want to rant about how evil the RIAA and MPAA are, and how entertainment companies' employees and attorneys are bad people, there are plenty of other places for you to go.